Subtext

LLY

Eli Lilly and Company2024 Q1

SectorHealth Care
Date2024-04-30
Overall sentiment-1.7
Total words3595
CEO words376
CFO words280
Analyst words1182
Trailing EPS$7.87
Forward EPS est.$13.93
Forward P/E54.4
Sourceglopardo

Transcript

Each turn shows the speaker, their inferred role, the section, and that turn's net sentiment (×1000).

OperatorOperator+0.0

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Lilly Q1 2024 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]

Joe FletcherIR+9.3

Thank you, Paul, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for Eli Lilly and Company's Q1 2024 Earnings Call. I'm Joe Fletcher, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. And joining me on today's call are Dave Ricks, Lilly's Chair and CEO; Anat Ashkenazi, Chief Financial Officer; Dr. Dan Skovronsky, Chief Scientific Officer and President of Lilly Immunology; Anne White, President of Lilly Neuroscience; Ilya Yuffa, President of Lilly International; Jake Van Naarden, President of Loxo at Lilly; and Patrik Jonsson, President of Lilly Diabetes and Obesity and Lilly U.S.A. We're also joined by Michaela Irons, Mike Springnether and Lauren Zierki of the IR team.

David RicksCEO+49.4

Okay. Thanks, Joe. We're pleased with our Q1 results and the continued momentum in our business, which positions us well for accelerated growth as this year progresses. Our focus is to bring innovative medicines to people in need. And in 2024, we're investing in our people, our launches, expanding our pipeline of new medicines, including through business development, and of course, accelerating the needed capacity in our manufacturing network. Results this quarter represent a continuation of the strong growth we delivered in 2023.

Anat AshkenaziCFO+33.3

Thanks, Dave. Slide 6 summarizes financial performance in the first quarter of 2024. First quarter revenue growth of 26% was driven by new products, primarily Mounjaro and Zepbound. Gross margin as a percent of revenue increased from 78.4% in Q1 2023 to 82.5% in Q1 2024. Gross margin in the quarter benefited from higher realized prices, variable product mix and, to a lesser extent, improved production costs.

Daniel SkovronskyOther-35.7

Thanks, Anat. Let me start with our exciting announcement from earlier this month. That was the positive Phase III results from the SURMOUNT-OSA studies, which evaluated tirzepatide for treatment of adults with obesities and moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea known as OSA. OSA is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by complete or partial collapse of the upper airway during sleep. OSA can have serious cardiometabolic complications contributing to hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and even type 2 diabetes.

We're also announcing that in the coming months, we'll be initiating Phase III studies evaluating lebrikizumab in two new indicationsOther+15.2

chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and allergic rhinitis due to perennial allergens. Lebrikizumab will be the first biologic to be evaluated in Phase III for allergic rhinitis. We're optimistic about the potential of lebrikizumab to be an important treatment option in these patient populations as well as in atopic dermatitis. In earlier-stage immunology development, we've advanced our CD19 antibody into Phase II for multiple sclerosis.

David RicksCEO+23.3

Okay. Thanks, Dan. Before we go to Q&A, let me briefly sum up the progress in our first quarter. Strong revenue growth in Q1 was driven by our recent product launches, primarily Mounjaro and Zepbound. We expect acceleration in revenue growth through the second half of the year as supply of incretin medicines continues to ramp. Significant advances in our pipeline include top line data from tirzepatide and SURMOUNT-OSA, approval of the KwikPen delivery device from Mounjaro in the EU, submission of mirikizumab and lebrikizumab as well as initiation of lepodisiran Phase III study, as Dan just mentioned. We are continuing to invest in recent and upcoming launches, internal and external pipeline development and our manufacturing expansion agenda. This is to sustain our long-term growth outlook.

Joe FletcherIR-41.7

Thanks, Dave. We'd like to take questions from as many callers as possible and to conclude our call in a timely manner. [Operator Instructions]

OperatorOperator-76.9

[Operator Instructions] The first question today is coming from Chris Schott from JPMorgan.

Christopher SchottAnalyst+12.7

Congrats on the progress here. I just had a question, just was hoping you could elaborate a bit more on the capacity dynamics that are leading to the guidance raise today. Specifically just looking for little more color, is this more U.S. or international? And should we read this as more capacity in the system than you expected or just a faster ramp of the new plant and maybe the same overall capacity as you exit the year?

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Thanks, Chris. I'll hand over to Anat to talk about the guidance raise.

Anat AshkenaziCFO-25.6

Thanks for the question, Chris. And as we've mentioned earlier in the year when we issued guidance, we said that we expect capacity and supply to ramp towards the second half of the year, and that's what we're seeing.

OperatorOperator-90.9

The next question is coming from Mohit Bansal from Wells Fargo.

Mohit BansalAnalyst-37.0

I have a question regarding the pricing. So if you look at the script trend, it seems like there was a little bit of adverse relationship in the pricing versus fourth quarter. Can you comment on that? And how should we think about the cadence of price volume over the quarters for the year?

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Thanks, Mohit. You didn't say it, but I assume you're talking about Mounjaro and Zepbound so I'll hand over to Patrik to make some commentary on net price.

Patrik JonssonOther+0.0

Thank you very much, Mohit. When you look at the pricing of Mounjaro, I think it's important to take into account that in the Q4 earnings, we announced a onetime adjustment for Mounjaro in Q4 that was quite significant. So it was a onetime adjustment in the base of Q4.

OperatorOperator-100.0

The next question is coming from Umer Raffat from Evercore.

Umer RaffatAnalyst-51.7

I wanted to focus a quick second on Part D reimbursement dynamics, if I may. And my question is, will tirzepatide be considered differently than a "weight loss drug" to secure Part D reimbursement? And the new indications like sleep apnea, will they considered an applicable drug and not get lumped up as a broad "weight loss drug"?

Joe FletcherIR-111.1

Thanks, Umer. I'll go to Patrik for that question.

Patrik JonssonOther+24.7

Thank you very much, Umer. I think with the announcement made by the CMS early April to reimburse comorbidities for obesity based upon the SELECT trial, we're also confident that with the new data that we presented just weeks ago in terms of obstructive sleep apnea, that's going to be reimbursed in Medicare Part D. And we expect similarly for other comorbidities and the readout of HFpEF, assuming that's positive and approved, and later on with the mobility-mortality outcome study.

OperatorOperator-100.0

The next question is coming from Seamus Fernandez from Guggenheim.

Seamus FernandezAnalyst+21.1

Great. So really just wanted to ask, Dan, as you have assessed the Phase II SURMOUNT data in NASH, just interested to know how you are thinking about those data and the opportunity for tirzepatide in that setting or perhaps if retatrutide remains the right target molecule to move forward there? We've had a lot of speculation around some of the comments from the last quarter and just trying to firm that up and also when we're likely to see those data, I believe, they're expected at EASL, but if that is possible to confirm.

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Dan?

Daniel SkovronskyOther+25.0

Thanks, Seamus. So I'll start with the last part there. Yes, the abstract was accepted and will be presented at EASL early June. So that will be the opportunity to see the full NASH package from that Phase II trial.

OperatorOperator-90.9

The next question will be from Tim Anderson from Wolfe Research.

Timothy AndersonAnalyst+13.9

You showed a slide, Zepbound has NBRx share market of 57% end of Q1. That makes it pretty clear that the strongest drug wins. So on that topic, just your latest thinking on upcoming competitor readouts and how they'll stack up to Zepbound on metrics of weight loss and blood sugar. So specifically, CagriSema from Novo and Amgen's 133. I know it's just the best guess, but it's what we get asked to do.

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Thanks, Tim. Okay. I'll maybe hand to Dan for some comments.

Daniel SkovronskyOther-12.3

Yes, sure, Tim. It's probably more of your job than ours to speculate on competitor readouts but I'll take a stab at it since you asked. I think on AMG 133, we've just seen really a small amount of data. So probably anything is possible and like you will be interested to see their results. Of course, there's arguments that can be heard about GIP agonism versus antagonism. We've placed our bets, and we like the data we got with GIP agonism.

OperatorOperator-90.9

The next question will be from Terence Flynn from Morgan Stanley.

Terence FlynnAnalyst+16.9

Congrats on all the progress. Just was wondering if you can tell us if the IQVIA prescription data is an accurate representation of tirzepatide volumes or if it's been underrepresented at all given LillyDirect and what you know about how much is flowing through that channel? And if it is underrepresented, can you help quantify any delta for us.

Joe FletcherIR-66.7

Thanks for the question, Terence. I'll hand to Patrik for commentary on IQVIA and LillyDirect.

Patrik JonssonOther+60.6

Thanks very much, Terence. When it comes to LillyDirect, I think we are very pleased with the start. And when we look at the utilization by consumers, it's gaining traction by weeks here.

OperatorOperator-100.0

The next question will be from Akash Tewari from Jefferies.

Akash TewariAnalyst-15.6

So your team presented data on a monotherapy GIP agonist at ADA last year, but it looks like you are moving the amylin into Phase II. Can you talk about why amylin might be preferred versus GIP as a maintenance regimen for obesity? And how your product could defer versus others when it comes to half-life and preferential agonism versus calcitonin and amylin?

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Thank you, Akash. I'll hand to Dan for a commentary on our amylin.

Daniel SkovronskyOther+0.0

Yes, there are a lot of good questions in there. Thanks for following so closely. So on the GIP, the long-acting molecule, I think primarily in that experiment, we were excited to show the benefits of isolated GIP agonism, just to answer some mechanism of action questions around tirzepatide. But as you point out, there's potential for that molecule for other indications or as a monotherapy or combination with other mechanisms.

OperatorOperator-100.0

The next question will be from Trung Huynh from UBS.

Trung HuynhAnalyst-15.4

Just back on CMS recently broadening its coverage for Wegovy for certain heart conditions. I appreciate you mentioned that TROA is the main goal. But do you expect Zepbound to get added to CMS in a similar way as Wegovy? And when could this happen? Could this be after the heart failure data in 3Q? Or do we have to wait for the CVOT data?

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Thanks, Trung. I'll let Patrik respond.

Patrik JonssonOther+13.9

Thanks, Trung. Now based upon what CMS stated early April, we actually expect to get obstructive sleep apnea for Zepbound covered by CMS and Medicare at the time of launch. And the next one then would be HFpEF assuming a positive readout and approval. And the third one would be the MMO indication. That's the sequence of our plans, assuming everything goes according to plan and we get the approval for both.

OperatorOperator-83.3

The next question will be from Geoff Meacham from Bank of America.

Geoffrey MeachamAnalyst+0.0

You guys have been asked on this before, I'm sure, but can you just review the rationale in utilizing the KwikPen just for outside the U.S. markets like Europe. I wasn't sure why this couldn't apply to the U.S. market and if this also could be a means to relieve capacity looking forward?

Joe FletcherIR-83.3

Thanks, Geoff, for the question. Paul -- Dave, you want to weigh in? .

David RicksCEO+0.0

Yes. Sure. And Ilya can add to this. As we think we've said on several calls now, our goal is to pursue all of the above, basically as it relates to supply options, recognizing the tremendous demand and unmet need and the constraints that exist in scaling the supply chain. So KwikPen uses existing assets, so there was less time lag. We see this first in the U.K. and now in Europe as a way to meet the needs of those patients. But we haven't ruled it out in other jurisdictions. And so we'll continue to look at every option we can to meet the needs of patients with obesity and overweight as well as with diabetes.

OperatorOperator-111.1

The next question is from Kerry Holford from Berenberg.

Kerry HolfordAnalyst+0.0

I'm going to take a different topic here. Looking LP(a), your new product you've now said that you're taking into Phase III. Can you confirm whether you've published new Phase II data, haven't found any. So if I'm correct, when might we see that published? And can you confirm what dose and frequency of administration you're looking at from that Phase III study? And I guess that you appear to be positioned third in that race, would be interested to hear how you expect your drug to be differentiated versus the competitor as that's already in Phase III.

Joe FletcherIR+40.0

Thanks, Kerry. So a good multipart question, but on Lp(a), happy to talk about lepodisiran. So Dan, do you want to comment on this?

Daniel SkovronskyOther+20.6

Yes. Thanks, Kerry, for the good questions here. You're right, we haven't yet published a Phase II data. But I think we just recently were able to publish the Phase I data. That was really exciting and well received. I think one of the things that people noted in our Phase I data was a very long durability of action and a very deep reduction in Lp(a) levels following a single dose of lepodisiran. We now have, of course, a Phase II data in hand and use that to design and begin the Phase III trial.

OperatorOperator-90.9

The next question will be from Steve Scala from TD Cowen.

Steve ScalaAnalyst+16.4

Given that based on all available metrics, the SURPASS-CVOT interim likely already has passed, can you confirm that the only way the trial would have stopped is if there were either a survival benefit or futility and not simply non-inferiority? And anything you can say regarding your confidence in eventually hitting superiority based on what you know so far?

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Thanks, Steve. Dan, do you want to take the question on SURPASS-CVOT?

Daniel SkovronskyOther+0.0

Sure. Thanks, Steve. As you know, we do our best not to comment on interim analyses, although many of our different trials can incorporate interim analyses. But when we do talk about the risks, unintentional unblinding of results, for that reason, we prefer not to do that.

OperatorOperator-83.3

The next question will be from Evan Seigerman from BMO Capital Markets.

Evan SeigermanAnalyst+0.0

I wanted to touch on donanemab with the AdCom approaching. Can you discuss how your -- if your confidence has changed in the asset? And maybe any specific points that you hope will be addressed during this discussion with these outside experts.

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Thanks, Evan. Anne, you want to discuss [ donanemab ] and AdCom?

Anne WhiteOther+0.0

Yes. Thanks so much for the question. And we are incredibly confident in donanemab's potential and the fact that it offers very meaningful benefits to people with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease and just the overall approvability of the package. We do look forward to seeing there's questions. We haven't received those yet. I think that what we'll anticipate really is discussions around the safety and efficacy of donanemab. And those -- the safety and efficacy profile remain very consistent with what we published and presented. So nothing new there.

OperatorOperator-100.0

Next question will be from David Risinger from Leerink Partners.

David RisingerAnalyst+0.0

And let me add my congrats on the progress and the guidance raise. So my question is on orforglipron. Novo Nordisk has raised some concerns about the scalability of orforglipron manufacturing given its complexity. I haven't spoken to Novo directly, but someone told me that they mentioned there are 35 steps in the process. I don't know if that's true. But could you please discuss how Lilly is building out its manufacturing capacity and whether the company expects to be able to meet global demand in the Western world after launch in 2026? Or whether we, the investment community, should expect supply constraints and should be guarded about how we try to model orforglipron's ramp after launch?

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Thanks, Dave. I'll hand over to our Dave Ricks here.

David RicksCEO+20.0

Okay. Great. Dave, great to hear from you. I mean, first of all, it is true that orforglipron is a complicated large small molecule, a large small molecule, if you were, and there are many steps in the process. You can read about them in our patent filings, I think.

OperatorOperator-111.1

Next question is coming from Louise Chen from Cantor.

Louise ChenAnalyst+0.0

I just wanted to ask you about your next wave of obesity drug. It looks like you've got half a dozen of these in development. And where do you think you can most differentiate yourself?

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Dan, do you want to comment on earlier phase obesity?

Daniel SkovronskyOther+24.4

Yes. Thanks, Louise. We're excited about that portfolio of earlier-stage obesity molecules. I think there's a number of opportunities for improvement over even an excellent drug like tirzepatide. We think about the quality of weight loss as one aspect. So for example, even on tirzepatide, we see the ratio of lean to fat mass approved as patients lose weight on these drugs. Could we make it improve even faster with the muscle stimulating agents like bimagrumab? But maybe that's under investigation.

OperatorOperator-100.0

The next question is from Chris Shibutani from Goldman Sachs.

Joe FletcherIR-200.0

Thanks, Chris. Paul, next question?

Chris ShibutaniAnalyst+0.0

Can you hear me?

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Oh, yes, there you are. Go ahead, Chris.

Chris ShibutaniAnalyst+10.1

Wanted to ask about the supply and dynamic -- and the demand and when those two might come closer together? Previously, Anat, you've been quite specific in your vocabulary and saying that, that was something that could possibly happen in 2025. Dave, you were in front of a group that we hosted and I think you gave a little bit of a broader range. What's the latest that you would like to communicate based upon all the progress that you're making, the acquisition of Wisconsin facility, et cetera, about a potential timing for that supply-demand dynamic to come closer together?

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Thanks, Chris. Anat?

Anat AshkenaziCFO+36.4

Yes. Let me start on this. So I would say that, as I said in my prepared remarks, we expect that the supply and demand situation will remain quite tight in the near term as well as the midterm. And just to clarify, it's not that we have a production issue. Our manufacturing facilities are progressing incredibly well, and I'm incredibly proud of the work done by our M&Q colleagues around the world. Clearly, we have sites working 24/7. We're doing construction overnight. We're making the right investments and so we're progressing rapidly as you've seen evidenced by the results as well as the raise we did for the year.

OperatorOperator-111.1

Next question will be from Carter Gould from Barclays.

Carter L. GouldAnalyst-32.8

I wanted to dive into bimagrumab ahead of the Phase IIb data forthcoming. Can you talk for a bit around the importance of showing stat sig or clear dose response across the composition of the weight loss drivers and maybe as well as the importance of not blunting the overall weight loss as you contemplate a move to Phase III potentially?

Joe FletcherIR-83.3

Thanks, Carter, for the question. Dan, you want to comment on bimagrumab?

Daniel SkovronskyOther-13.7

Yes. Thanks, Carter. It's a good question. Bimagrumab is a very different mechanism of weight loss versus incretins but one that we think could be important in combination with incretins. So bimagrumab, we think will likely have important effects on adipose tissue as well as muscle mass. And so our hope is to see increased muscle mass and increased ratio, I should say, of lean to fat mass by combining bimagrumab with incretins.

OperatorOperator-90.9

The next question is coming from Kripa Devarakonda from Truist Securities.

Srikripa DevarakondaAnalyst+20.0

Congrats on all the progress. I have a question about your radiopharma pipeline. You mentioned PNT2002 in your oncology pipeline. Can you talk about how you see that advancing? And given what you've seen so far, where you see this being placed in the landscape in terms of market share?

Joe FletcherIR-47.6

Thanks, Kripa, for the question. Jake, calling you to maybe opine a little bit on our radioligand efforts, PNT2001 in particular?

Jacob Van NaardenOther+13.9

Yes, happy to. Thanks for the question. We're really excited about bringing radiopharmaceuticals into the portfolio by way of the acquisition of POINT Biopharma, and we are supplementing that acquisition with additional work through our discovery labs and the ability to make these medicines ourselves. So I expect we'll have more to talk about in terms of additional medicines over the course of the next couple of years in addition to PNT2001.

Joe FletcherIR-90.9

Paul, I think we've got time for maybe one more question. We're right at 11. So maybe a final question in the queue.

OperatorOperator-71.4

Okay. And the final question today is coming from James Shin from Deutsche Bank.

James ShinAnalyst+0.0

I just wanted to try and reconcile the guidance lift with the 1.5x saleable doses being maintained.

Joe FletcherIR+0.0

Okay. James, maybe I'll give to Anat to talk about the guidance and how the guidance raise relates to the 1.5x dose comments.

Anat AshkenaziCFO-15.6

So let's start with the 1.5 dose -- sellable dose comment that I made on the guidance call in February. So that reference is not a number of devices, but number of sellable doses. And as we ramp up capacity for KwikPen, recall that unlike the single-use vial or the auto-injector, that KwikPen is a multidose device that has multiple doses available for patients.

Joe FletcherIR+20.4

Thanks, Anat. Great. Well, thanks for your time today, everyone, and we appreciate you participating in today's earnings call and your interest in our company. Please follow up with the IR team if you have any additional questions that we didn't address today, and have a great day. Thanks.

OperatorOperator+0.0

Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude our conference for today. This conference will be made available for replay beginning at 1:00 p.m. today running through June 4 at midnight. You may access the replay system at any time by dialing (800) 332-6854 and entering the access code 317750. International dialers can call (973) 528-0005. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.